H.R. 9164

H.R. 9164: To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to make grants to eligible entities to acquire and install milk storage-related equipment for use in elementary schools and secondary schools, an

Introduced Glenn Thompson (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9164 aims to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide grants to eligible entities, such as schools, for the acquisition and installation of milk storage-related equipment. This is intended to enhance milk storage capabilities in elementary and secondary schools.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9164 emphasize its potential to improve nutrition in schools by ensuring that milk is stored properly and remains safe for consumption. They argue that this investment could lead to better health outcomes for students and support local dairy farmers by increasing the demand for milk in school programs.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9164 express concerns about the allocation of federal funds for equipment grants, suggesting that it may divert resources away from other pressing educational needs. Some argue that the bill does not address broader issues related to school nutrition programs and could lead to unnecessary spending on infrastructure rather than direct nutritional support.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of H.R. 9164, which aims to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to facilitate milk storage equipment in schools, shows no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Glenn Thompson's top donor industries. While there is significant lobbying activity in the education and food service sectors, the absence of direct financial ties between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's donors suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. The lobbying expenditures, such as $120,000 from CEDIA and $1,000,000 from the Friends Committee on National Legislation, do not directly influence the bill's primary focus on milk storage in schools, further indicating that the potential for conflicts is minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not directly correlate with the financial interests of the sponsor's top donors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION $1,000,000
CEDIA CEDIA $120,000
HEARTFLOW, INC. HEARTFLOW, INC. $90,000
KNOA PHARMA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
HELIX DEFENSE CROSS POTOMAC CONSULTING LLC undisclosed
SUR HOLDINGS BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GLOBAL KRATOM COALITION BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP ON BEHALF OF CURATIVE INC. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
ORCA BIO BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
IONQ, INC. IONQ, INC. undisclosed
LIFE360 EMERGENT STRATEGIES undisclosed
ZILLOW BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
TWENTY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. THE COMPLETE AGENCY undisclosed
CULTURAL CARE INC. KEEFE STRATEGIES LLC FKA KEEFE SINGISER PARTNERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FORENSIC NURSES POLSINELLI PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Glenn Thompson, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $720,000,000
Individuals: $720,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $225,000,000
Individuals: $225,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us