H.R. 9041

H.R. 9041: To establish programs to improve bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and incentivize the use of bicycles in transit, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mike Thompson (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9041 aims to create programs that enhance bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure across the U.S. The bill seeks to promote the use of bicycles as a mode of transportation by providing incentives and resources for communities to improve bike paths, sidewalks, and related facilities.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9041 highlight its potential to promote healthier lifestyles, reduce traffic congestion, and lower carbon emissions. Media coverage has praised the bill for encouraging sustainable transportation options and improving urban mobility, which can lead to safer and more accessible communities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9041 argue that the bill may divert funding from other essential transportation projects, particularly in areas where bicycle infrastructure is not a priority. Some media outlets have raised concerns about the practicality of implementing such programs in rural or less densely populated areas, suggesting that the focus on bicycles might not address broader transportation needs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9041, which aims to improve bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, shows no direct overlaps between the sponsor Mike Thompson's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in bicycle or pedestrian infrastructure, which reduces the likelihood of conflicts of interest. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes contributions from various organizations, but none are directly tied to the bicycle or pedestrian sectors. The highest contributions come from industries such as chemicals and postal services, which do not relate to the bill's focus on transportation alternatives. Therefore, while there is some lobbying activity, it does not suggest a significant risk of conflict for this particular legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC $260,000
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL FKA MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION ZIEBART CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ORGANIC PRODUCE ASSOCIATION THE RUSSELL GROUP, INC. $50,000
GRAVITICS TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL INC VENABLE LLP $30,000
CITY OF WILLISTON (ND) NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS $28,000
S&P GLOBAL F/K/A IHS MARITIME & TRADE VENABLE LLP $20,000
TOWN OF TUSAYAN NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE $5,000
NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRIES, INC. VENABLE LLP undisclosed
ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
US CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed
CX2 ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Thompson, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $480,000,000
Individuals: $480,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $150,000,000
Individuals: $150,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us