H.R. 8861

H.R. 8861: To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide post-employment limits for attorneys of the United States, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mary Scanlon (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8861 aims to amend Title 18 of the United States Code to impose restrictions on the post-employment activities of attorneys who have served in the U.S. government. This likely includes limits on their ability to represent private clients or lobby on behalf of organizations after leaving government service, in order to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure ethical standards are maintained.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8861 have praised the bill as a necessary step towards enhancing government integrity and accountability. They argue that by limiting post-employment opportunities for former government attorneys, the legislation helps to reduce the risk of corruption and ensures that public servants remain committed to serving the public interest even after their government tenure.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8861 have expressed concerns that the bill could overly restrict the career options of former government attorneys, potentially discouraging talented individuals from serving in government roles. Some argue that the legislation may hinder the ability of these attorneys to leverage their expertise in the private sector, which could ultimately reduce the pool of qualified candidates willing to enter public service.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$210,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Crime and Law Enforcement

The bill H.R. 8861 aims to amend post-employment limits for attorneys of the United States, which does not directly relate to the industries that are the top donors to sponsor Mary Scanlon. Her top donor industries include Health Professionals, contributing $160,000,000, and Retired individuals, contributing $50,000,000. Since there are no direct overlaps between the bill's subject matter and these donor industries, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. The absence of PAC contributions further reduces the likelihood of undue influence from organized interests.

While the health sector is a significant contributor, the nature of the bill does not suggest that it would directly benefit or harm this industry. Therefore, voters can be reassured that the financial backing for the sponsor does not create a clear conflict regarding the legislative intent of H.R. 8861.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mary Scanlon, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $160,000,000
Individuals: $160,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $50,000,000
Individuals: $50,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us