H.R. 8820

H.R. 8820: To limit the use of certain funds for the deactivation of Expeditionary Combat Aviation Brigades, and for other purposes.

Introduced Morgan Luttrell (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8820 is a bill that seeks to restrict the use of specific funds that could be allocated for the deactivation of Expeditionary Combat Aviation Brigades. This implies that the bill aims to ensure the continued operation and funding of these military units, which are critical for aviation support in combat scenarios.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 8820 for its focus on maintaining military readiness and ensuring that Expeditionary Combat Aviation Brigades remain operational. Supporters argue that these brigades play a vital role in national defense and that the bill reflects a commitment to military strength.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8820 have raised concerns about the potential for misallocation of funds and the implications of limiting budgetary flexibility. Some argue that this bill could hinder necessary restructuring within the military and that it may prioritize specific units over broader strategic needs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donors and the subject matter of H.R. 8820, there are significant lobbying activities in related areas. For instance, the American College of Clinical Pharmacy contributed $144,981, which indicates a vested interest in healthcare and possibly military health services. Additionally, Persistent Systems, LLC, which donated $60,000, is involved in technology solutions that could intersect with military operations. Although these connections are indirect, they suggest potential influences on the bill's outcomes that could favor the interests of these donors. Voters should be aware that while there is no direct conflict, the financial ties could still shape legislative priorities.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY $144,981
PERSISTENT SYSTEMS, LLC PERSISTENT SYSTEMS, LLC $60,000
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $40,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION $40,000
GOTRIANGLE MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $30,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF CDFI CEOS MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $20,000
CITY OF GLADEWATER, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $12,000
CITY OF CRANDALL, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
NATIONAL SLEEP FOUNDATION SLEEP, INC. undisclosed
SLEEP, INC. SLEEP, INC. undisclosed
THE LIVINGSTON GROUP ON BEHALF OF INNOVATIVE VACCINE TECHNOLOGIES MAGILL ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
LUMBEE TRIBE HOLDINGS, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
CITY OF CLEVELAND, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF RIO HONDO, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Morgan Luttrell, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us