H.R. 8791

H.R. 8791: To provide for the long-term improvement of Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and for other purposes.

Introduced J. Hill (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8791 aims to enhance and improve Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) through long-term support and funding. The bill likely includes provisions for financial assistance, infrastructure development, and resources to strengthen the educational opportunities and overall sustainability of HBCUs.

Positive Media Summary

The bill has been positively received in media for its commitment to supporting HBCUs, which play a crucial role in providing education and opportunities for Black students. Advocates highlight the importance of investing in these institutions to promote equity in higher education and to address historical disparities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill have raised concerns about the adequacy of the proposed funding and whether it will effectively address the systemic issues faced by HBCUs. Some argue that without comprehensive reforms and additional support, the bill may not lead to the significant improvements needed for these institutions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 8791, which aims to improve Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor J. Hill's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the educational sector or in HBCUs specifically. While there is lobbying activity in the bill's policy area, the contributions from entities such as the Securities Investor Protection Corporation ($30,000) and the Security Industry Association ($34,000) do not indicate a direct conflict with the goals of the legislation. The undisclosed amounts from other lobbying entities further complicate the analysis but do not suggest a clear conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while there is lobbying activity, it does not directly correlate with the interests of HBCUs, suggesting that the risk of conflict is low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
YMCA OF THE USA YMCA OF THE USA $110,000
RED BULL NORTH AMERICA, INC. RED BULL NORTH AMERICA, INC. $60,000
SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $34,000
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION RICH FEUER ANDERSON $30,000
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA RAILROADS THE CACTUS GROUP, LLC $22,500
POWERUS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $17,500
SENECA NATION SPIRIT ROCK CONSULTING undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS undisclosed
ALLIANCE FOR MEDICARE THE PICARD GROUP, LLC undisclosed
GULF PORTS ASSN PAT YOUNGER undisclosed
FUTURE DEFENSE USA, INC. DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed
THE KNOT WORLDWIDE INC. FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) undisclosed
CITY OF FIFE, WA DESIMONE CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE HEALTH LMH STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS undisclosed
MEDTELLS BLUE TUSK COMMUNICATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding J. Hill, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us