H.R. 8654

H.R. 8654: To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to reauthorize the Nita M. Lowey Community Learning Centers program for fiscal years 2026 through 2035, and for other purposes.

Introduced Dan Goldman (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8654 aims to amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 by reauthorizing the Nita M. Lowey Community Learning Centers program for the fiscal years 2026 through 2035. This program typically supports after-school and summer learning opportunities for students, focusing on improving educational outcomes and providing additional resources for students in need.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8654 have praised the bill for its commitment to enhancing educational opportunities for children, particularly those from low-income families. Media coverage has highlighted the importance of after-school programs in fostering academic success and providing safe environments for students, emphasizing that the reauthorization will ensure continued funding and support for these vital services.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8654 have raised concerns about the long-term funding implications and the effectiveness of the Community Learning Centers program. Some media outlets have questioned whether the program adequately addresses the root causes of educational disparities, suggesting that simply reauthorizing existing programs may not lead to significant improvements in student outcomes.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 8654, which aims to reauthorize the Nita M. Lowey Community Learning Centers program, shows no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Dan Goldman’s top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes multiple organizations, but the disclosed amounts are limited, with only DIRSHU INTERNATIONAL contributing $100,000 through MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION. This suggests a low likelihood of conflicts of interest as the primary focus of the bill is educational funding, which does not align with the interests of the listed donors. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the lack of significant financial ties to the bill's objectives minimizes potential conflicts.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
DIRSHU INTERNATIONAL MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION $100,000
CEO WORKS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $45,000
KAZI IG SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $15,000
SOUTHERN FOLGER CONTRACTING BBT STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
WATERFRONT GLOBAL BBT STRATEGIES LLC $5,200
DIGITALEUROPE VIVID STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
DR. STEPHEN SOLOWAY MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ONE ISRAEL FUND MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HEMOGLOBIN OXYGEN THERAPEUTICS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ATAOLLAH AMINPOUR MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HERSEL NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MORAD BEN NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MARK SCOTT MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
BORIS MINTS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Dan Goldman, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us