H.R. 8632

H.R. 8632: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose an excise tax on the sale of perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, to establish a credit for expenditures paid or incurred for the removal of such substances from public water system

Introduced Linda Sánchez (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8632 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to create an excise tax on the sale of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are chemicals often found in various consumer products and linked to environmental and health issues. Additionally, the bill proposes a tax credit for expenses incurred in the removal of these substances from public water systems.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8632 have praised the bill for addressing the growing concerns over PFAS contamination in drinking water. They argue that the excise tax could discourage the use of harmful substances and that the tax credit for removal efforts would incentivize municipalities and organizations to clean up water supplies, ultimately protecting public health.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8632 have expressed concerns that the excise tax may increase costs for consumers and businesses that rely on products containing PFAS. Some argue that the bill could lead to unintended economic consequences and that the focus should instead be on more comprehensive regulatory measures rather than taxation.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$420,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

Based on the available data, there appears to be no direct conflict of interest between Representative Linda Sánchez's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 8632. The bill aims to impose an excise tax on the sale of perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, which are chemicals commonly used in industrial and consumer products. However, Representative Sánchez's top donors come from the health professionals and retired industries, which do not appear to have a direct stake in the legislation. While there has been lobbying activity in the policy area of the bill, none of these groups are among Sánchez's top donors. Therefore, the risk of a conflict of interest is low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $65,000
FEDERATED INDIANS OF THE GRATON RANCHERIA PACE, LLP $60,000
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA PACE, LLP $60,000
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
QUAPAW NATION PACE, LLP $50,000
CA STATE ASSEMBLY PACE, LLP $50,000
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI PACE, LLP $40,000
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS PACE, LLP $35,000
PENOBSCOT NATION PACE, LLP $30,000
COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $30,000
KARUK TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
NAPA VALLEY VINTNERS ASSOCIATION PACE, LLP $20,000
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
WEST LOS ANGELES VETERANS' COLLECTIVE PACE, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Linda Sánchez, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $320,000,000
Individuals: $320,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $100,000,000
Individuals: $100,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us