H.R. 8606

H.R. 8606: To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to ensure no funds made available under such Acts may be awarded to a charter school or charter management organization that enters

Introduced Rosa DeLauro (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8606 aims to amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to prohibit the allocation of federal funds to charter schools or charter management organizations that engage in certain unspecified actions. The bill appears to focus on ensuring that charter schools adhere to specific standards or practices, although the exact criteria are not detailed in the title.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8606 argue that the bill is a necessary step to ensure accountability and quality in charter schools, particularly in relation to the education of students with disabilities. Advocates believe that it will help protect vulnerable students and ensure they receive the appropriate resources and support.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8606 contend that the bill could unfairly restrict funding for charter schools, which they argue provide valuable educational options and competition for traditional public schools. Opponents fear that the bill may limit parental choice and hinder the growth of successful charter programs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 8606, which aims to amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Rosa DeLauro's top donor industries. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in charter schools or charter management organizations, which are the primary focus of this legislation. While there is lobbying activity in related areas, such as education and environmental organizations, the amounts and entities involved do not indicate a significant conflict of interest regarding this specific bill. Therefore, the risk of conflicts arising from financial contributions is considered low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA LLC JOHN MCENTEE $225,000
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION $180,000
PARKER MEGGITT PARKER MEGGITT $100,000
GUIDESTAR ELDERCARE LOPER CONSULTING LLC $40,000
GERSHOW RECYCLING CORPORATION BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
PACE UNIVERSITY BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
NATURA RESOURCES BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
TOSHIBA CORPORATION BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $18,000
AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
NATIONAL RETIREE LEGISLATIVE NETWORK ALYSON PARKER $15,000
TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $10,000
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TWO RIVERS LLC $6,000
JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION CARTER LAWS & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Rosa DeLauro, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us