H.R. 7257

H.R. 7257: SECURE Grid Act

Passed House Robert Latta (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The SECURE Grid Act extends requirements for state energy security plans until 2031. States must submit these plans to the Department of Energy (DOE) to qualify for federal funding for energy conservation. The DOE is not required to approve these plans but must offer assistance to states in developing and revising them. The new requirements include addressing weather threats, supply chain risks for electricity equipment, and the security of local energy distribution systems. Additionally, the Government Accountability Office will report on how effective these state plans are.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the SECURE Grid Act highlight its proactive approach to strengthening energy security in the face of climate change and supply chain vulnerabilities. They praise the bill for encouraging states to enhance their energy infrastructure and for providing necessary federal assistance, which could lead to more robust and resilient energy systems across the country.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the SECURE Grid Act express concerns that the lack of required DOE approval for state energy security plans could lead to inconsistencies in how states address energy vulnerabilities. Some argue that the bill may not go far enough in ensuring comprehensive security measures are implemented, potentially leaving states ill-prepared for significant energy disruptions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Energy

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Robert Latta's top donor industries and the subject matter of the SECURE Grid Act, there is notable lobbying activity in related policy areas. For instance, WUXI APPTEC SALES LLC contributed $150,000, which may indicate a vested interest in the energy or technology sectors that could intersect with grid security. Additionally, the HEALTH INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION and other contributors have made smaller donations, suggesting a broader interest in legislative outcomes that could indirectly affect their operations. However, the absence of direct financial ties to the specific provisions of the bill mitigates the risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware of the influence of these lobbyists, as their financial backing could sway legislative priorities.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WUXI APPTEC SALES LLC DGA GROUP GOVERNMENT RELATIONS LLC $150,000
TETRA PAK, INC. TETRA PAK, INC. $90,000
AMERICAN PEANUT SHELLERS ASSOCIATION AMERICAN PEANUT SHELLERS ASSOCIATION $46,749
NATIONAL TRUCK EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATION NATIONAL TRUCK EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATION $40,000
TALENTBRIDGE THE WALTER GROUP $30,000
ENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA THE WALTER GROUP $20,000
AMERICARBON SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC $20,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC $20,000
HEALTH INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION MCDERMOTT+ LLC $10,000
APPALACHIAN CHILDREN COALITION SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC $10,000
MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC $10,000
CORE NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. FKA CONSOL ENERGY INC. SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC $10,000
ASGA FISHERIES POLICY ALLIANCE INC MR. ANTHONY FRIEDRICH undisclosed
ASGA FISHERIES POLICY ALLIANCE INC ASGA FISHERIES POLICY ALLIANCE INC undisclosed
SCIOTO VALLEY - PIKETON AREA (COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS) SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us