H.R. 5775

H.R. 5775: FCRA Liability Harmonization Act

Reported by Committee Barry Loudermilk (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The FCRA Liability Harmonization Act (H.R. 5775) proposes changes to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by setting limits on the damages and attorney fees that can be awarded in class-action lawsuits for willful or negligent violations. Specifically, it caps total class-action recoveries at the lesser of $500,000 or 1% of the defendant's net worth, eliminates punitive damages for willful violations, and restricts attorney fees to the lesser of $100,000 or 40% of actual damages awarded.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters argue that the bill provides businesses with more predictable liability exposure by capping damages and attorney fees, which could reduce frivolous lawsuits and encourage compliance with the FCRA. They believe these measures will create a more balanced legal environment for credit reporting agencies and other businesses subject to the FCRA.

Negative Media Summary

Critics contend that the bill undermines consumer protection by significantly limiting the financial consequences for companies that violate the FCRA. They argue that capping damages and attorney fees may deter consumers from pursuing legitimate claims, thereby reducing accountability for credit reporting agencies and other entities that mishandle credit information.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The FCRA Liability Harmonization Act, sponsored by Barry Loudermilk, does not exhibit direct industry overlaps with the sponsor's top donor industries, which include Health Professionals and Retired individuals. The total contributions from these industries amount to $157,500,000, but they do not directly relate to the bill's subject matter. Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the amounts from specific entities do not indicate a direct financial interest in the bill itself. For example, Organogenesis and Netscout have contributed $15,000 and $10,000 respectively, but they do not have a clear connection to the sponsor's top donor industries. Thus, the risk of conflict of interest appears minimal based on the available data.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
EGAN-JONES RATINGS COMPANY INVARIANT LLC $50,000
GRADIUM MEGA COIN HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $50,000
DRAI HEALTH HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $50,000
VALTHOS INC. INVARIANT LLC $40,000
SANDY BAY PARTNERS, LLC GRACE BAY STRATEGIES, LLC $20,000
ATLANTIS BLU HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $20,000
ORGANOGENESIS DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
ANTENNA RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
NETSCOUT DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
ALLLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS MEA STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
REGIONAL FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP COALITION ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
JACKSON WALKER LLP ON BEHALF OF SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
ANTHEIA INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
RAILROAD INVESTIGATION PROJECT GROUP EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC undisclosed
EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Barry Loudermilk, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us