H.J.Res.29

H.J.Res. 29: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times.

Introduced Andrew Ogles (R) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 29 is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow a person to be elected President up to three times. It specifies that a person cannot serve more than three terms total, cannot be elected for an additional term after serving two consecutive terms, and cannot be elected more than twice if they have served more than two years of a term that was originally held by someone else.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 29 argue that the proposed amendment would provide voters with more choices by allowing experienced leaders to run for office more than twice, potentially enhancing democratic participation and leadership continuity.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 29 contend that the amendment could undermine the spirit of the Twenty-Second Amendment, which was established to prevent any one individual from holding too much power for too long, raising concerns about the potential for a concentration of power in the presidency.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
6/10
Risk Level
Medium
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Government Operations and Politics

The bill H.J.Res.29 proposes an amendment to limit presidential terms to three, which does not directly relate to the primary industries contributing to sponsor Andrew Ogles. However, there is a significant overlap with the 'Retired' industry, which contributed $75,000,000 to Ogles. This connection raises questions about whether the interests of retired individuals, who may have specific political motivations, could influence the sponsor's support for this constitutional amendment. The substantial financial backing from this sector suggests a potential conflict of interest, as the motivations behind such donations could be aimed at shaping government operations and political dynamics in favor of their interests. Voters should be aware that while the bill may appear to be a straightforward governance issue, the financial ties could indicate underlying motivations that may not align with broader public interests.

Industry Overlap — Follow the Money

These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.

Industry Match Type Related Subject Donations
Retired (W06) Sector Government Operations and Politics $75,000,000
Total from overlapping industries $75,000,000
Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Andrew Ogles, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us